On 15/01/2025 20:28, Peter Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:47:52PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote: >> When mremap()ing a memory region previously registered with userfaultfd >> as write-protected but without UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP, an >> inconsistency in flag clearing leads to a mismatch between the vma flags >> (which have uffd-wp cleared) and the pte/pmd flags (which do not have >> uffd-wp cleared). This mismatch causes a subsequent mprotect(PROT_WRITE) >> to trigger a warning in page_table_check_pte_flags() due to setting the >> pte to writable while uffd-wp is still set. >> >> Fix this by always explicitly clearing the uffd-wp pte/pmd flags on any >> such mremap() so that the values are consistent with the existing >> clearing of VM_UFFD_WP. Be careful to clear the logical flag regardless >> of its physical form; a PTE bit, a swap PTE bit, or a PTE marker. Cover >> PTE, huge PMD and hugetlb paths. >> >> Co-developed-by: Mikołaj Lenczewski <miko.lenczew...@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Mikołaj Lenczewski <miko.lenczew...@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.robe...@arm.com> >> Closes: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/810b44a8-d2ae-4107-b665-5a42eae2d...@arm.com/ >> Fixes: 63b2d4174c4a ("userfaultfd: wp: add the writeprotect API to >> userfaultfd ioctl") >> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > > Nothing I see wrong: > > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Great thanks! > > One trivial thing: some multiple-line comments is following the net/ coding > style rather than mm/, but well.. I don't think it's a huge deal. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#commenting Noted, I'll aim to get it right in future. > > Thanks again. >
