I wonder if this is expected ? (in current 2.6.24-git) commit 7e9916040b3020d0f36d68bb7512e3b80b623097 and commit eee3af4a2c83a97fff107ddc445d9df6fded9ce4
Both use the same TIF number (25) in thread_info_64.h. This patch changes the TIF ids. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/asm-x86/thread_info_64.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/thread_info_64.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/asm-x86/thread_info_64.h 2008-01-30 09:52:56.000000000 -0500 +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-x86/thread_info_64.h 2008-01-30 09:53:14.000000000 -0500 @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ static inline struct thread_info *stack_ #define TIF_FREEZE 23 /* is freezing for suspend */ #define TIF_FORCED_TF 24 /* true if TF in eflags artificially */ #define TIF_DEBUGCTLMSR 25 /* uses thread_struct.debugctlmsr */ -#define TIF_DS_AREA_MSR 25 /* uses thread_struct.ds_area_msr */ -#define TIF_BTS_TRACE_TS 26 /* record scheduling event timestamps */ +#define TIF_DS_AREA_MSR 26 /* uses thread_struct.ds_area_msr */ +#define TIF_BTS_TRACE_TS 27 /* record scheduling event timestamps */ #define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE (1<<TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) #define _TIF_SIGPENDING (1<<TIF_SIGPENDING) -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
