On 1/8/25 19:06, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Some of the core functions can only be called if the transport
> has been assigned.
>
> As Michal reported, a socket might have the transport at NULL,
> for example after a failed connect(), causing the following trace:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0
> #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> PGD 12faf8067 P4D 12faf8067 PUD 113670067 PMD 0
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 1198 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+
> RIP: 0010:vsock_connectible_has_data+0x1f/0x40
> Call Trace:
> vsock_bpf_recvmsg+0xca/0x5e0
> sock_recvmsg+0xb9/0xc0
> __sys_recvfrom+0xb3/0x130
> __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30
> do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
>
> So we need to check the `vsk->transport` in vsock_bpf_recvmsg(),
> especially for connected sockets (stream/seqpacket) as we already
> do in __vsock_connectible_recvmsg().
>
> Fixes: 634f1a7110b4 ("vsock: support sockmap")
> Reported-by: Michal Luczaj <m...@rbox.co>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/5ca20d4c-1017-49c2-9516-f6f75fd33...@rbox.co/
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Michal Luczaj <m...@rbox.co>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
> index 4aa6e74ec295..f201d9eca1df 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static int vsock_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr
> *msg,
> size_t len, int flags, int *addr_len)
> {
> struct sk_psock *psock;
> + struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> int copied;
>
> psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
> @@ -84,6 +85,13 @@ static int vsock_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct
> msghdr *msg,
> return __vsock_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
>
> lock_sock(sk);
> + vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> +
> + if (!vsk->transport) {
> + copied = -ENODEV;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> if (vsock_has_data(sk, psock) && sk_psock_queue_empty(psock)) {
> release_sock(sk);
> sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
> @@ -108,6 +116,7 @@ static int vsock_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct
> msghdr *msg,
> copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags);
> }
>
> +out:
> release_sock(sk);
> sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
>
