On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 12:07:25AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 10:42:14AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> > From: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org>
> > 
> > After a CPU has set itself offline and before it eventually calls
> > rcutree_report_cpu_dead(), there are still opportunities for callbacks
> > to be enqueued, for example from an IRQ. When that happens on NOCB, the
> > rcuog wake-up is deferred through an IPI to an online CPU in order not
> > to call into the scheduler and risk arming the RT-bandwidth after
> > hrtimers have been migrated out and disabled.
> > 
> > But performing a synchronized IPI from an IRQ is buggy as reported in
> > the following scenario:
> > 
> >     WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26 at kernel/smp.c:633 smp_call_function_single
> >     Modules linked in: rcutorture torture
> >     CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 
> > 6.11.0-rc1-00012-g9139f93209d1 #1
> >     Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x320 <- __stop_cpus+0xd0/0x120
> >     RIP: 0010:smp_call_function_single
> >     <IRQ>
> >     swake_up_one_online
> >     __call_rcu_nocb_wake
> >     __call_rcu_common
> >     ? rcu_torture_one_read
> >     call_timer_fn
> >     __run_timers
> >     run_timer_softirq
> >     handle_softirqs
> >     irq_exit_rcu
> >     ? tick_handle_periodic
> >     sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
> >     </IRQ>
> > 
> > The periodic tick must be shutdown when the CPU is offline, just like is
> > done for oneshot tick. This must be fixed but this is not enough:
> > softirqs can happen on any hardirq tail and reproduce the above scenario.
> > 
> > Fix this with introducing a special deferred rcuog wake up mode when the
> > CPU is offline. This deferred wake up doesn't arm any timer and simply
> > wait for rcu_report_cpu_dead() to be called in order to flush any
> > pending rcuog wake up.
> > 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.s...@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231644.4c55582d-...@intel.com
> > Fixes: 9139f93209d1 ("rcu/nocb: Fix RT throttling hrtimer armed from 
> > offline CPU")
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
> 
> You can drop this patch, it has been replaced with another version upstream.
> 
Dropped. Thank you!

--
Uladzislau Rezki

Reply via email to