On Tuesday 29 January 2008 18:41, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 January 2008 01:33:29 am Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 January 2008 10:05, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > [PATCH 2/2] x86_64: make early_node_mem return align address
> > >
> > > boot oops when system get 64g or 128g installed
> >
> > Probably it should just use reserve_early(). Does this patch work?
> >
> > The alignment change is needed at some point too, but only to
> > relax the alignment to not force all early allocations to be page
> > padded.
>
> No, my patch doesn't force all early allocations to be page padded.
> for find_e820_mem, i just change PAGE_ALIGN to be aligned align
> parameter....
They are already all PAGE_ALIGN()ed (which is too strict, but needs
some care to fix properly), but your patch uses it the wrong way.
The PAGE_ALIGNment was added some time ago to avoid such over
lapping, but it should not actually be needed for that anymore.
>
> only make early_node_mem have aligned data. because it seems it like
> to...and assume that.
Using alignment doesn't seem the correct way to avoid overlapping.
If there is still overlap then some reservation needs to be extended.
> I think your patch will get early panic about overlap between bss and
> bootmem... like the 256g machine, bss is overlapped with early page
> table...
Well did you test it?
bss should have been reserved by this line in head64.c
reserve_early(__pa_symbol(&_text), __pa_symbol(&_end));
(in git-x86). In earlier kernels it was checked for explicitely by the e820
allocator.
-Andi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
