On 9/14/24 3:32 AM, Feng zhou wrote:
From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng...@bytedance.com>

This patch adds a test for TCP over IPv4 via INET6 API.

Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng...@bytedance.com>
---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c      | 13 ++++++--
  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c
index 7d4a9b3d3722..3cad92128e60 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c
@@ -15,8 +15,11 @@
#define CG_NAME "/setget-sockopt-test" +#define INT_PORT 8008
+
  static const char addr4_str[] = "127.0.0.1";
  static const char addr6_str[] = "::1";
+static const char addr6_any_str[] = "::";
  static struct setget_sockopt *skel;
  static int cg_fd;
@@ -67,6 +70,35 @@ static void test_tcp(int family)
        ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_binddev, 2, "nr_bind");
  }
+static void test_tcp_over_ipv4_via_ipv6(void)
+{
+       struct setget_sockopt__bss *bss = skel->bss;
+       int sfd, cfd;
+
+       memset(bss, 0, sizeof(*bss));
+       skel->bss->test_tcp_over_ipv4_via_ipv6 = 1;
+
+       sfd = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM,
+                          addr6_any_str, INT_PORT, 0);
+       if (!ASSERT_GE(sfd, 0, "start_server"))
+               return;
+
+       cfd = connect_to_addr_str(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, addr4_str, INT_PORT, 
NULL);
+       if (!ASSERT_GE(cfd, 0, "connect_to_addr_str")) {
+               close(sfd);
+               return;
+       }
+       close(sfd);
+       close(cfd);
+
+       ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_listen, 1, "nr_listen");
+       ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_connect, 1, "nr_connect");
+       ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_active, 1, "nr_active");
+       ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_passive, 1, "nr_passive");
+       ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_socket_post_create, 2, "nr_socket_post_create");
+       ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_binddev, 2, "nr_bind");
+}
+
  static void test_udp(int family)
  {
        struct setget_sockopt__bss *bss = skel->bss;
@@ -191,6 +223,7 @@ void test_setget_sockopt(void)
        test_udp(AF_INET);
        test_ktls(AF_INET6);
        test_ktls(AF_INET);
+       test_tcp_over_ipv4_via_ipv6();

This has a conflict with commit d53050934e66.

pw-bot: cr

done:
        setget_sockopt__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c
index 60518aed1ffc..ff834d94dd23 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ int nr_connect;
  int nr_binddev;
  int nr_socket_post_create;
  int nr_fin_wait1;
+int test_tcp_over_ipv4_via_ipv6;
struct sockopt_test {
        int opt;
@@ -262,9 +263,15 @@ static int bpf_test_sockopt(void *ctx, struct sock *sk)
                if (n != ARRAY_SIZE(sol_ip_tests))
                        return -1;
        } else {
-               n = bpf_loop(ARRAY_SIZE(sol_ipv6_tests), bpf_test_ipv6_sockopt, 
&lc, 0);
-               if (n != ARRAY_SIZE(sol_ipv6_tests))
-                       return -1;
+               if (test_tcp_over_ipv4_via_ipv6) {
+                       n = bpf_loop(ARRAY_SIZE(sol_ip_tests), bpf_test_ip_sockopt, 
&lc, 0);

Can this bpf_loop(..., bpf_test_ip_sockopt, ...) be always run? Then the above test_tcp_over_ipv4_via_ipv6() addition will not be needed.


+                       if (n != ARRAY_SIZE(sol_ip_tests))
+                               return -1;
+               } else {
+                       n = bpf_loop(ARRAY_SIZE(sol_ipv6_tests), 
bpf_test_ipv6_sockopt, &lc, 0);
+                       if (n != ARRAY_SIZE(sol_ipv6_tests))
+                               return -1;
+               }
        }
return 0;


Reply via email to