> As David pointed out, it is "reserved for future use - you must set > these bits to zero and not use it _for your own purposes_. For non-rfc > use of these bits _will_ break something the day we start using them > for something useful. > > So, no reason for a firewall author to check these bits. I thought that most firewalls were supposed to be insanely paranoid. Perhaps it would be considered a possible covert data channel, as farfecthed as that may sound. rick jones -- ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/misc/rachel/ these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to email, OR post, but please do NOT do BOTH... my email address is raj in the cup.hp.com domain... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lincoln Dale
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Helge Hafting
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Rick Jones
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Rusty Russell
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Cox
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Wagner
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Brian May
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Frank v Waveren
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Frank v Waveren
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier
- Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell
- RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Schwartz