On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:04:40PM -0700, Tim Merrifield wrote: > > Thanks for the review, Kirill. > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:19:54PM +0300, Kirill A . Shutemov wrote: > > Hm. Per-thread flag is odd. I think it should be per-process. > > This is the only point I might need some clarification on. I agree > there doesn't seem to be much value in allowing per-thread control, > but I don't see any precedence for setting per-process flags through > arch_prctl or similar interfaces. Am I missing something?
LAM is per-process. But it can only be enabled while the process has only one thread and locks on second thread spawn. See MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_LAM. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
