Hi Alexandre,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:23 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> We cannot delay the icache flush after patching some functions as we may
> have patched a function that will get called before the icache flush.
>
> The only way to completely avoid such scenario is by flushing the icache
> as soon as we patch a function. This will probably be costly as we don't
> batch the icache maintenance anymore.
>
> Fixes: 6ca445d8af0e ("riscv: Fix early ftrace nop patching")
> Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor.doo...@microchip.com>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240613-lubricant-breath-061192a9489a@wendy/
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com>
Thanks for your patch, which is now commit edf2d546bfd6f5c4 ("riscv:
patch: Flush the icache right after patching to avoid illegal
insns") in v6.10-rc6.
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> @@ -189,9 +205,6 @@ int patch_text_set_nosync(void *addr, u8 c, size_t len)
>
> ret = patch_insn_set(tp, c, len);
>
> - if (!ret)
> - flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)tp, (uintptr_t)tp + len);
> -
> return ret;
> }
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_set_nosync);
patch_text_set_nosync() is now identical to (static) patch_insn_set(),
and the latter has no other callers.
> @@ -224,9 +237,6 @@ int patch_text_nosync(void *addr, const void *insns,
> size_t len)
>
> ret = patch_insn_write(tp, insns, len);
>
> - if (!ret)
> - flush_icache_range((uintptr_t) tp, (uintptr_t) tp + len);
> -
> return ret;
> }
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_text_nosync);
patch_text_nosync() is now identical to patch_insn_write(), and both
functions are called from outside this file.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
