On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 02:55:49PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> Add the function to support setting the MAC address.
> For vdpa/mlx5, the function will use mlx5_mpfs_add_mac
> to set the mac address
>
> Tested in ConnectX-6 Dx device
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <l...@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> index 26ba7da6b410..f78701386690 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> @@ -3616,10 +3616,33 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_dev_del(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev
> *v_mdev, struct vdpa_device *
> destroy_workqueue(wq);
> mgtdev->ndev = NULL;
> }
> +static int mlx5_vdpa_set_attr_mac(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev,
> + struct vdpa_device *dev,
> + const struct vdpa_dev_set_config *add_config)
> +{
> + struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(dev);
> + struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev);
> + struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev = mvdev->mdev;
> + struct virtio_net_config *config = &ndev->config;
> + int err;
> + struct mlx5_core_dev *pfmdev;
> +
> + if (add_config->mask & (1 << VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR)) {
> + if (!is_zero_ether_addr(add_config->net.mac)) {
Is the core happy to call into the driver without validating the MAC
address? Will the core pass the broadcast address? That is not
zero. Or a multicast address? Should every driver repeat the same
validation, and probably get it just as wrong?
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
