On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:08 PM Dragos Tatulea <dtatu...@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> No need to iterate over max number of VQs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatu...@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cra...@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <epere...@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> index 96782b34e2b2..51630b1935f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static void suspend_vqs(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ndev->mvdev.max_vqs; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++)
> suspend_vq(ndev, &ndev->vqs[i]);
> }
>
> @@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ static void resume_vq(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev,
> struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue *mv
>
> static void resume_vqs(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> {
> - for (int i = 0; i < ndev->mvdev.max_vqs; i++)
> + for (int i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++)
> resume_vq(ndev, &ndev->vqs[i]);
> }
>
>
> --
> 2.45.1
>
