Hi Arnaud,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0]

url:    
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20240607-183305
base:   1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0
patch link:    
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240607093326.369090-6-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v6 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to 
load the firmware
config: s390-allyesconfig 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240608/202406081214.qfail90a-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240608/202406081214.qfail90a-...@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
| Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406081214.qfail90a-...@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/fortify-string.h:6,
                    from include/linux/string.h:374,
                    from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:7,
                    from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:9:
>> arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h:53:21: error: expected declaration specifiers or 
>> '...' before '{' token
      53 | #define WARN_ON(x) ({                                   \
         |                     ^
   include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h:94:9: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ON'
      94 |         WARN_ON(1);
         |         ^~~~~~~
   In file included from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:23:
   include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h:96:9: error: expected identifier or '(' 
before 'return'
      96 |         return NULL;
         |         ^~~~~~
   include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h:97:1: error: expected identifier or '(' 
before '}' token
      97 | }
         | ^
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:717:34: error: 
'tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table' undeclared here (not in a function); did you 
mean 'rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table'?
     717 |         .find_loaded_rsc_table = tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table,
         |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                  rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table


vim +53 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h

a9df8e325d0de5 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h Heiko Carstens 2010-01-13  52  
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27 @53  
#define WARN_ON(x) ({                                 \
fd0cbdd378258f include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-08-02  54        
int __ret_warn_on = !!(x);                      \
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  55        
if (__builtin_constant_p(__ret_warn_on)) {      \
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  56        
        if (__ret_warn_on)                      \
b2be05273a1744 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h Ben Hutchings  2010-04-03  57        
                __WARN();                       \
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  58        
} else {                                        \
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  59        
        if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on))            \
b2be05273a1744 arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h Ben Hutchings  2010-04-03  60        
                __WARN();                       \
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  61        
}                                               \
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  62        
unlikely(__ret_warn_on);                        \
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  63  })
c0007f1a65762e include/asm-s390/bug.h      Heiko Carstens 2007-04-27  64  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Reply via email to