* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.24-git3 adds a 5 - 10 sec delay to the suspend and hibernation
> code paths (probably related to the disabling of nonboot CPUs), which
> is [EMAIL PROTECTED]&*() annoying.
>
> It's 100% reproducible on my HP nx6325 and bisection idendified the
> following commit as the first bad one:
>
> commit 764a9d6fe4b52995c8aba277e3634385699354f4
> Author: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:04 2008 +0100
>
> sched: track highest prio task queued
hm, this patch is a NOP, so it's weird that it has an effect.
Do you have serial logging enabled perhaps? If the following WARN_ON()
triggers:
+ WARN_ON(p->prio < rq->rt.highest_prio);
then perhaps that can cause a 5-10 seconds delay. (that's how much time
it takes to printk a warning on the slowest serial settings)
but if you use suspend, then any such printks would be preserved in the
dmesg, right? If the WARN_ON() triggers, and if you remove it, do things
get faster?
this does have the feel of being scheduling related, but are you
absolutely sure about the precise identity of the patch? It's not the
next patch or the preceding patch by any chance? (which would also be
scheduler patches)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
