> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:23:03 -0800 Tim Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I suspect these features reduce the chance a crash messages makes it out > > onto the console, but fail to spot any of the copious text mention this > > critical issue. > > Anything not in interrupts would not be deferred. > The following code is meant to avoid deferring in oops as well. > I'm not sure if that covers all crash cases or not. > If you know of other cases, and ways to detect them, please advise. >
Yes, using oops_in_progress seems an appropriate fix for that. I assume that another downside is that printk-from-interrupt will now get jumbled up with an interrupted pritk-from-non-interrupt. Please use checkpatch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
