Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> It occurs to me that it might be a good idea to pick a different port for
> these things. I know a lot of people who want to use port 80h for
> debugging data, especially in embedded x86 systems.
>
Find a safe port, make sure it is tested the hell out of, and we'll
consider it.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Ian S. Nelson
- Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly ... Matthew Dharm
- Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possi... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, p... Matthew Dharm
- Re: Linux Post codes during runti... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, p... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Linux Post codes during runti... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux Post codes during r... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Linux Post codes duri... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux Post codes duri... David Welch
- Re: Linux Post codes duri... Paul Gortmaker
- Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly ... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possi... H. Peter Anvin

