On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:54:54 -0500, Michal Koutný <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 08:06:55PM -0700, Haitao Huang <[email protected]> wrote:+static void sgx_epc_cgroup_free(struct misc_cg *cg) +{ + struct sgx_epc_cgroup *epc_cg; + + epc_cg = sgx_epc_cgroup_from_misc_cg(cg);It should check for !epc_cg since the misc controller implementation in misc_cg_alloc() would roll back even on non-allocated resources.
Good catch. Will fix.
+ cancel_work_sync(&epc_cg->reclaim_work); + kfree(epc_cg); +} + +static void sgx_epc_cgroup_max_write(struct misc_cg *cg) +{ + struct sgx_epc_reclaim_control rc; + struct sgx_epc_cgroup *epc_cg; + + epc_cg = sgx_epc_cgroup_from_misc_cg(cg); + + sgx_epc_reclaim_control_init(&rc, epc_cg); + /* Let the reclaimer to do the work so user is not blocked */ + queue_work(sgx_epc_cg_wq, &rc.epc_cg->reclaim_work);This is weird. The writer will never learn about the result of the operation.
Right. With the new plan, this callback will be removed. Thanks Haitao
