On 2023/9/23 16:57, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
Hi Wuqiang,

I dug my mail box and found this. Sorry for replying late.

On Tue,  5 Sep 2023 09:52:50 +0800
"wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.m...@bytedance.com> wrote:

This patch series introduces a scalable and lockless ring-array based
object pool and replaces the original freelist (a LIFO queue based on
singly linked list) to improve scalability of kretprobed routines.

v9:
   1) objpool: raw_local_irq_save/restore added to prevent interruption

      To avoid possible ABA issues, we must ensure objpool_try_add_slot
      and objpool_try_add_slot are uninterruptible. If these operations
      are blocked or interrupted in the middle, other cores could overrun
      the same slot's ages[] of uint32, then after resuming back, the
      interrupted pop() or push() could see same value of ages[], which
      is a typical ABA problem though the possibility is small.

      The pair of pop()/push() costs about 8.53 cpu cycles, measured
      by IACA (Intel Architecture Code Analyzer). That is, on a 4Ghz
      core dedicated for pop() & push(), theoretically it would only
      need 8.53 seconds to overflow a 32bit value. Testings upon Intel
      i7-10700 (2.90GHz) cost 71.88 seconds to overrun a 32bit integer.

What does this mean? This sounds like "There is a timing issue if it's enough 
fast".

Yes, that's why local irq must be disabled. If push()/pop() is interrupted or preempted long enough (> 10 seconds for the extreme cases), other nodes could
overrun the same ages[] of 32-bit, then after resuming to execution the push()
or pop() would see the same value without notifying the overrun, which is a
typical ABA.

Changing ages[] to 64-bit could be a solution, but it's inappropriate for
32-bit OS and looks too heavy. With local irg disabled, push() or pop() is
uninterrupted,thus the ABA is avoided.

push() or pop() consumes only ~4 cycles to complete (most of the use cases), so raw_local_irq_save/restore are used instead of local_irq_save/restore to
minimize the overhead.

Let me reivew the patch itself.

Thanks,


   2) codes improvements: thanks to Masami for the thorough inspection

v8:
   1) objpool: refcount added for objpool lifecycle management

wuqiang.matt (5):
   lib: objpool added: ring-array based lockless MPMC
   lib: objpool test module added
   kprobes: kretprobe scalability improvement with objpool
   kprobes: freelist.h removed
   MAINTAINERS: objpool added

  MAINTAINERS              |   7 +
  include/linux/freelist.h | 129 --------
  include/linux/kprobes.h  |  11 +-
  include/linux/objpool.h  | 174 ++++++++++
  include/linux/rethook.h  |  16 +-
  kernel/kprobes.c         |  93 +++---
  kernel/trace/fprobe.c    |  32 +-
  kernel/trace/rethook.c   |  90 +++--
  lib/Kconfig.debug        |  11 +
  lib/Makefile             |   4 +-
  lib/objpool.c            | 338 +++++++++++++++++++
  lib/test_objpool.c       | 689 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  12 files changed, 1320 insertions(+), 274 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 include/linux/freelist.h
  create mode 100644 include/linux/objpool.h
  create mode 100644 lib/objpool.c
  create mode 100644 lib/test_objpool.c

--
2.40.1






Reply via email to