On 9/14/23 00:03, Chen Ni wrote:
> Use devm_kstrdup() instead of kstrdup() and check its return value to
> avoid memory leak.
>
> Fixes: 49bddc73d15c ("libnvdimm/of_pmem: Provide a unique name for bus
> provider")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nic...@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.ji...@intel.com>
One unrelated comment below.
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v2 -> v3:
>
> 1. Use devm_kstrdup() instead of kstrdup()
>
> v1 -> v2:
>
> 1. Add a fixes tag.
> 2. Update commit message.
> ---
> drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> index 1b9f5b8a6167..5765674b36f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,13 @@ static int of_pmem_region_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> if (!priv)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - priv->bus_desc.provider_name = kstrdup(pdev->name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + priv->bus_desc.provider_name = devm_kstrdup(&pdev->dev, pdev->name,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv->bus_desc.provider_name) {
> + kfree(priv);
I wonder if priv should be allocated with devm_kzalloc() instead to reduce the
resource management burden.
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> priv->bus_desc.module = THIS_MODULE;
> priv->bus_desc.of_node = np;
>
