On 13.09.2023 10:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/09/2023 10:47, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 13.09.2023 09:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 12/09/2023 15:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> These clocks are now handled from within the icc framework and are >>> >>> That's a driver behavior, not hardware. >> I believe we've been over this already.. >> >> The rationale behind this change is: that hardware, which falls >> under the "interconnect" class, was previously misrepresented as >> a bunch of clocks. There are clocks underneath, but accessing them >> directly would be equivalent to e.g. circumventing the PHY subsystem >> and initializing your UFS PHY from within the UFS device. > > And every time one write such commit msg, how should we remember there > is some exception and actually it is about clock representation not CCF > or ICC framework. So is your reply essentially "fine, but please make it clear in each commit message"?
Konrad
