Previously, numa_off was set unconditionally in dummy_numa_init() even with a fake numa node. Then ACPI sets node id as NUMA_NO_NODE(-1) after acpi_map_pxm_to_node() because it regards numa_off as turning off the numa node. Hence dev_dax->target_node is NUMA_NO_NODE on arm64 with fake numa case.
Without this patch, pmem can't be probed as RAM devices on arm64 if SRAT table isn't present: $ndctl create-namespace -fe namespace0.0 --mode=devdax --map=dev -s 1g -a 64K kmem dax0.0: rejecting DAX region [mem 0x240400000-0x2bfffffff] with invalid node: -1 kmem: probe of dax0.0 failed with error -22 This fixes it by using fallback memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() as nid. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin...@arm.com> --- v2: - rebase it based on David's "memory group" patch. - drop the changes in dev_dax_kmem_remove() since nid had been removed in remove_memory(). drivers/dax/kmem.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c index a37622060fff..e4836eb7539e 100644 --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c @@ -47,20 +47,7 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax) unsigned long total_len = 0; struct dax_kmem_data *data; int i, rc, mapped = 0; - int numa_node; - - /* - * Ensure good NUMA information for the persistent memory. - * Without this check, there is a risk that slow memory - * could be mixed in a node with faster memory, causing - * unavoidable performance issues. - */ - numa_node = dev_dax->target_node; - if (numa_node < 0) { - dev_warn(dev, "rejecting DAX region with invalid node: %d\n", - numa_node); - return -EINVAL; - } + int numa_node = dev_dax->target_node; for (i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++) { struct range range; @@ -71,6 +58,22 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax) i, range.start, range.end); continue; } + + /* + * Ensure good NUMA information for the persistent memory. + * Without this check, there is a risk but not fatal that slow + * memory could be mixed in a node with faster memory, causing + * unavoidable performance issues. Warn this and use fallback + * node id. + */ + if (numa_node < 0) { + int new_node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(range.start); + + dev_info(dev, "changing nid from %d to %d for DAX region [%#llx-%#llx]\n", + numa_node, new_node, range.start, range.end); + numa_node = new_node; + } + total_len += range_len(&range); } -- 2.17.1