Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/20/20 12:30, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of just letting the code
> fall through to the next case.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/isofs/rock.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/isofs/rock.c b/fs/isofs/rock.c
> index 94ef92fe806c..4880146babaf 100644
> --- a/fs/isofs/rock.c
> +++ b/fs/isofs/rock.c
> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ static int rock_ridge_symlink_readpage(struct file *file, 
> struct page *page)
>                       rs.cont_extent = isonum_733(rr->u.CE.extent);
>                       rs.cont_offset = isonum_733(rr->u.CE.offset);
>                       rs.cont_size = isonum_733(rr->u.CE.size);
> +                     break;
>               default:
>                       break;
>               }
> 

Reply via email to