On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:44:14 +0100,
Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 10 2021 at 13:00, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > dev_id and percpu_dev_id are mutually exclusive in struct irqaction,
> > as they conceptually represent the same thing, only in a per-cpu
> > fashion.
> >
> > Move them into an anonymous union, saving a few bytes on the way.
>
> The reason why they are not in an anomymous union is that any misuse of
> interfaces will result in an instantaneous explosion while with your
> variant it will cause hard to diagnose side effects.
>
> I rather waste the extra 4/8 bytes unless there is a compelling reason
> not to do so.
Fair enough. I just happened to spot it while doing some vaguely
related rework (turning the irqaction.irq field into an irqdesc).
Happy to leave it as is.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
