On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Nick Piggin wrote: > Yeah, for memory hot remove that makes sense. A comment > might be in order, at least a reference to the orphaned > page code in vmscan.c.
Right. The surrounding comments in mm/migrate.c also need to be made consistent. The comment before is now slightly off. Could you do another patch Shaohua with better comments? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
