On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, James Sutherland wrote: > This isn't a violation - the section quoted does not REQUIRE the > behaviour, it only RECOMMENDS it as being a good idea. Since implementing > it apparently makes DoS attacks easier, NOT implementing it is now a > better idea... Ok, now for the interoperability. Is there a problem with this when the recommendation is not followed? -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.1... Dave Dykstra
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.1... Manfred Spraul
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through ... Manfred Spraul
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through ... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 thro... Manfred Spraul
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 ... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 ... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 thro... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 ... Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.2... James Sutherland
- Re: Linu... Matthias Andree
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 ... David S. Miller
- Re: Linux 2.2... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linu... David S. Miller
- Re: ... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.2... James Sutherland
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.1... Studierende der Universitaet des Saarlandes
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through ... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.1... Dave Dykstra
- Re: Linux 2.2.16 through ... kuznet