> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye Bin <yebi...@huawei.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 4:52 AM
> To: yebi...@huawei.com; Qiang Zhao <qiang.z...@nxp.com>; Leo Li
> <leoyang...@nxp.com>
> Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org; Hulk Robot
> <hul...@huawei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH -next] soc: fsl: qe: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
> 
> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK() rather than
> explicitly calling spin_lock_init().

The previous version has been applied.  Thanks.

> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebi...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_common.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_common.c
> b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_common.c index 654e9246ce6b..a0cb8e746879
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_common.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>  #include <soc/fsl/qe/qe.h>
> 
>  static struct gen_pool *muram_pool;
> -static spinlock_t cpm_muram_lock;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpm_muram_lock);
>  static void __iomem *muram_vbase;
>  static phys_addr_t muram_pbase;
> 
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ int cpm_muram_init(void)
>       if (muram_pbase)
>               return 0;
> 
> -     spin_lock_init(&cpm_muram_lock);
>       np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,cpm-muram-data");
>       if (!np) {
>               /* try legacy bindings */

Reply via email to