On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 07:05:13PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 04:44:06PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 06:40:40PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > > > Very interesting. What happens if you call loop() twice? And now I
> > > > wonder
> > > > whether it's root or cwd, actually... Hmm...
> > > >
> > > > How about this:
> > > > fd = open("/proc/self/mountinfo", 0);
> > > > mkdir("./newroot/foo", 0777);
> > > > mount("./newroot/foo", "./newroot/foo", 0, MS_BIND, NULL);
> > > > chroot("./newroot");
> > > > chdir("/foo");
> > > > while (1) {
> > > > static char buf[4096];
> > > > int n = read(fd, buf, 4096);
> > > > if (n <= 0)
> > > > break;
> > > > write(1, buf, n);
> > > > }
> > > > close(fd);
> > > > drop_caps();
> > > > loop();
> > > > as the end of namespace_sandbox_proc(), instead of
> > > > chroot("./newroot");
> > > > chdir("/");
> > > > drop_caps();
> > > > loop();
> > > > sequence we have there?
> > >
> > > Uhum, well then we oops properly with a null-deref.
> >
> > Cute... Could you dump namei.o (ideally - with namei.s) from your build
> > someplace public?
>
> Yeah, I have at least namei.o
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AvO1St0YltIrA86DXjp1Xg3ojtS9owGh/view?usp=sharing
*grumble*
Is it reproducible without KASAN? Would be much easier to follow the produced
asm...
