On Fri, Apr 02, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/04/21 01:05, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > 
> > > +struct kvm_queued_exception {
> > > + bool valid;
> > > + u8 nr;
> > 
> > If we're refactoring all this code anyways, maybe change "nr" to something a
> > bit more descriptive?  E.g. vector.
> 
> "nr" is part of the userspace structure, so consistency is an advantage too.

Foiled at every turn.  Keeping "nr" probably does make sense.

Reply via email to