On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:33:23AM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > The requirement comes from an colleague who is frequently changing > the map-bench code for some customized test purpose. and he doesn't > want to build kernel image and reboot every time. So I moved the > requirement to Tao Tian. > > Right now, kthread_bind() is exported, kthread_bind_mask() seems > to be a little bit "internal" as you said, maybe a wrapper like > kthread_bind_node() won't be that "internal", comparing to exposing > the cpumask?
I really don't think we should be exporting more low-level kthread APIs. Especially as we've been trying to get most users off the kthread API and to workqueues instead.
