On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:53:02PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2021/04/01 15:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:57:47PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > >> KMSAN complains that the vmci_use_ppn64() == false path in > >> vmci_dbell_register_notification_bitmap() left upper 32bits of > >> bitmap_set_msg.bitmap_ppn64 member uninitialized. > >> > >> KMSAN also complains that vmci_check_host_caps() left the payload part > >> of check_msg uninitialized. > >> > > > > What commit does this "fix"? Can you resend with a proper "Fixes:" tag > > so we know where it needs to be backported to? > > It seems that this problem exists since the introduction. > > commit 83e2ec765be03e8a8a07619e65df70b48a1db023 > Author: George Zhang <georgezh...@vmware.com> > Date: Tue Jan 8 15:53:51 2013 -0800 > > VMCI: doorbell implementation. > > commit 1f166439917b69d3046e2e49fe923579d9181212 > Author: George Zhang <georgezh...@vmware.com> > Date: Tue Jan 8 15:55:32 2013 -0800 > > VMCI: guest side driver implementation. > > But this patch should be safe to backport to as old as possible, for > this patch is merely explicitly initializing variables.
Great, can you please resend with the Fixes: tag and a cc: stable in the signed-off-by area as well when you resend these as a 2 patch series? thanks, greg k-h
