Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> writes: > PPC32 encounters a KUAP fault when trying to handle a signal with > VDSO unmapped. > > Kernel attempted to read user page (7fc07ec0) - exploit attempt? (uid: > 0) > BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x7fc07ec0 > Faulting instruction address: 0xc00111d4 > Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] > BE PAGE_SIZE=16K PREEMPT CMPC885 > CPU: 0 PID: 353 Comm: sigreturn_vdso Not tainted > 5.12.0-rc4-s3k-dev-01553-gb30c310ea220 #4814 > NIP: c00111d4 LR: c0005a28 CTR: 00000000 > REGS: cadb3dd0 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted > (5.12.0-rc4-s3k-dev-01553-gb30c310ea220) > MSR: 00009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 48000884 XER: 20000000 > DAR: 7fc07ec0 DSISR: 88000000 > GPR00: c0007788 cadb3e90 c28d4a40 7fc07ec0 7fc07ed0 000004e0 7fc07ce0 > 00000000 > GPR08: 00000001 00000001 7fc07ec0 00000000 28000282 1001b828 100a0920 > 00000000 > GPR16: 100cac0c 100b0000 105c43a4 105c5685 100d0000 100d0000 100d0000 > 100b2e9e > GPR24: ffffffff 105c43c8 00000000 7fc07ec8 cadb3f40 cadb3ec8 c28d4a40 > 00000000 > NIP [c00111d4] flush_icache_range+0x90/0xb4 > LR [c0005a28] handle_signal32+0x1bc/0x1c4 > Call Trace: > [cadb3e90] [100d0000] 0x100d0000 (unreliable) > [cadb3ec0] [c0007788] do_notify_resume+0x260/0x314 > [cadb3f20] [c000c764] syscall_exit_prepare+0x120/0x184 > [cadb3f30] [c00100b4] ret_from_syscall+0xc/0x28 > --- interrupt: c00 at 0xfe807f8 > NIP: 0fe807f8 LR: 10001060 CTR: c0139378 > REGS: cadb3f40 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted > (5.12.0-rc4-s3k-dev-01553-gb30c310ea220) > MSR: 0000d032 <EE,PR,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 28000482 XER: 20000000 > > GPR00: 00000025 7fc081c0 77bb1690 00000000 0000000a 28000482 00000001 > 0ff03a38 > GPR08: 0000d032 00006de5 c28d4a40 00000009 88000482 1001b828 100a0920 > 00000000 > GPR16: 100cac0c 100b0000 105c43a4 105c5685 100d0000 100d0000 100d0000 > 100b2e9e > GPR24: ffffffff 105c43c8 00000000 77ba7628 10002398 10010000 10002124 > 00024000 > NIP [0fe807f8] 0xfe807f8 > LR [10001060] 0x10001060 > --- interrupt: c00 > Instruction dump: > 38630010 7c001fac 38630010 4200fff0 7c0004ac 4c00012c 4e800020 7c001fac > 2c0a0000 38630010 4082ffcc 4bffffe4 <7c00186c> 2c070000 39430010 > 4082ff8c > ---[ end trace 3973fb72b049cb06 ]--- > > This is because flush_icache_range() is called on user addresses. > > The same problem was detected some time ago on PPC64. It was fixed by > enabling KUAP in commit 59bee45b9712 ("powerpc/mm: Fix missing KUAP > disable in flush_coherent_icache()"). > > PPC32 doesn't use flush_coherent_icache() and fallbacks on > clean_dcache_range() and invalidate_icache_range().
But this code is also used for compat tasks on 64-bit. > We could fix it similarly by enabling user access in those functions, > but this is overkill for just flushing two instructions. > > The two instructions are 8 bytes aligned, so a single dcbst/icbi is > enough to flush them. Do like __patch_instruction() and inline > a dcbst followed by an icbi just after the write of the instructions, > while user access is still allowed. The isync is not required because > rfi will be used to return to user. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c > index 75ee918a120a..5b2ba2731957 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c > @@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ int handle_rt_signal32(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t > *oldset, > unsafe_put_user(PPC_INST_ADDI + __NR_rt_sigreturn, > &mctx->mc_pad[0], > failed); > unsafe_put_user(PPC_INST_SC, &mctx->mc_pad[1], failed); > + asm("dcbst %y0; sync; icbi %y0; sync" :: "Z" (mctx->mc_pad[0])); If I'm reading that right you're pointing the icbi at the user address. That's going to cause a KUAP fault just like we fixed in commit 59bee45b9712 ("powerpc/mm: Fix missing KUAP disable in flush_coherent_icache()"). We have user write access enabled, but the icbi is treated as a load. So I don't think that's going to work. cheers