On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:06:23PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This patch implements partial depopulation of percpu chunks.
> 
> As now, a chunk can be depopulated only as a part of the final
> destruction, when there are no more outstanding allocations. However
> to minimize a memory waste, it might be useful to depopulate a
> partially filed chunk, if a small number of outstanding allocations
> prevents the chunk from being reclaimed.
> 
> This patch implements the following depopulation process: it scans
> over the chunk pages, looks for a range of empty and populated pages
> and performs the depopulation. To avoid races with new allocations,
> the chunk is previously isolated. After the depopulation the chunk is
> returned to the original slot (but is appended to the tail of the list
> to minimize the chances of population).
> 
> Because the pcpu_lock is dropped while calling pcpu_depopulate_chunk(),
> the chunk can be concurrently moved to a different slot. So we need
> to isolate it again on each step. pcpu_alloc_mutex is held, so the
> chunk can't be populated/depopulated asynchronously.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <g...@fb.com>
> ---
>  mm/percpu.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
> index 6596a0a4286e..78c55c73fa28 100644
> --- a/mm/percpu.c
> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
> @@ -2055,6 +2055,96 @@ static void __pcpu_balance_workfn(enum pcpu_chunk_type 
> type)
>       mutex_unlock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * pcpu_shrink_populated - scan chunks and release unused pages to the system
> + * @type: chunk type
> + *
> + * Scan over all chunks, find those marked with the depopulate flag and
> + * try to release unused pages to the system. On every attempt clear the
> + * chunk's depopulate flag to avoid wasting CPU by scanning the same
> + * chunk again and again.
> + */
> +static void pcpu_shrink_populated(enum pcpu_chunk_type type)
> +{
> +     struct list_head *pcpu_slot = pcpu_chunk_list(type);
> +     struct pcpu_chunk *chunk;
> +     int slot, i, off, start;
> +
> +     spin_lock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
> +     for (slot = pcpu_nr_slots - 1; slot >= 0; slot--) {
> +restart:
> +             list_for_each_entry(chunk, &pcpu_slot[slot], list) {
> +                     bool isolated = false;
> +
> +                     if (pcpu_nr_empty_pop_pages < PCPU_EMPTY_POP_PAGES_HIGH)
> +                             break;
> +

Deallocation makes me a little worried for the atomic case as now we
could in theory pathologically scan deallocated chunks before finding a
populated one.

I wonder if we should do something like once a chunk gets depopulated,
it gets deprioritized and then only once we exhaust looking through
allocated chunks we then find a depopulated chunk and add it back into
the rotation. Possibly just add another set of slots? I guess it adds a
few dimensions to pcpu_slots after the memcg change.

> +                     for (i = 0, start = -1; i < chunk->nr_pages; i++) {
> +                             if (!chunk->nr_empty_pop_pages)
> +                                     break;
> +
> +                             /*
> +                              * If the page is empty and populated, start or
> +                              * extend the [start, i) range.
> +                              */
> +                             if (test_bit(i, chunk->populated)) {
> +                                     off = find_first_bit(
> +                                             pcpu_index_alloc_map(chunk, i),
> +                                             PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS);
> +                                     if (off >= PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS) {
> +                                             if (start == -1)
> +                                                     start = i;
> +                                             continue;
> +                                     }

Here instead of looking at the alloc_map, you can look at the
pcpu_block_md and look for a fully free contig_hint.

> +                             }
> +
> +                             /*
> +                              * Otherwise check if there is an active range,
> +                              * and if yes, depopulate it.
> +                              */
> +                             if (start == -1)
> +                                     continue;
> +
> +                             /*
> +                              * Isolate the chunk, so new allocations
> +                              * wouldn't be served using this chunk.
> +                              * Async releases can still happen.
> +                              */
> +                             if (!list_empty(&chunk->list)) {
> +                                     list_del_init(&chunk->list);
> +                                     isolated = true;

Maybe when freeing a chunk, we should consider just isolating it period
and preventing pcpu_free_area() from being able to add the chunk back
to a pcpu_slot.

> +                             }
> +
> +                             spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
> +                             pcpu_depopulate_chunk(chunk, start, i);
> +                             cond_resched();
> +                             spin_lock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
> +
> +                             pcpu_chunk_depopulated(chunk, start, i);
> +
> +                             /*
> +                              * Reset the range and continue.
> +                              */
> +                             start = -1;
> +                     }
> +
> +                     if (isolated) {
> +                             /*
> +                              * The chunk could have been moved while
> +                              * pcpu_lock wasn't held. Make sure we put
> +                              * the chunk back into the slot and restart
> +                              * the scanning.
> +                              */
> +                             if (list_empty(&chunk->list))
> +                                     list_add_tail(&chunk->list,
> +                                                   &pcpu_slot[slot]);
> +                             goto restart;
> +                     }
> +             }
> +     }
> +     spin_unlock_irq(&pcpu_lock);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * pcpu_balance_workfn - manage the amount of free chunks and populated pages
>   * @work: unused
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

Reply via email to