On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 22:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sounds fine! Don't hesitate to let us know about the lower-hanging > > > fruit you're thinking about. Here are the main things I have so far: > > > > > > * Ideas in the existing Linux-Tiny patchset. > > > * Disable support for non-Intel processors in x86 (cyrix.c, > > > centaur.c, transmeta.c, nexgen.c, umc.c in arch/x86/kernel/cpu). > > > As far as I remember, I saved 15 KB when I first experimented with > > > this). > > > > Isn't that already in -tiny? > > btw., are there any pending arch/x86 bits in -tiny? (stupid question: > were can i get the most uptodate version of -tiny from?)
It's not a stupid question. I dropped updating the tree regulary some time ago to focus on merging bits and then got a bit side-tracked by this little thing called "version control". Michael is attempting to get the tree started again and has put a quilt up here: http://elinux.org/images/3/3c/Tiny-quilt-2.6.23-0.tar.bz2 -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
