From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> commit 50809358dd7199aa7ce232f6877dd09ec30ef374 upstream.
Since there's already two copies of this code, introduce a helper now before adding a third one. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> [bwh: Backported to 4.9: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- kernel/futex.c | 5 +---- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 12 +++++++++--- kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -3234,10 +3234,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u * The waiter is allocated on our stack, manipulated by the requeue * code while we sleep on uaddr. */ - debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rt_waiter.pi_tree_entry); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rt_waiter.tree_entry); - rt_waiter.task = NULL; + rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter); ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &key2, VERIFY_WRITE); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -1176,6 +1176,14 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_stru next_lock, NULL, task); } +void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry); + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry); + waiter->task = NULL; +} + /** * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop * @lock: the rt_mutex to take @@ -1258,9 +1266,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; - debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.pi_tree_entry); - RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.tree_entry); + rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); /* * Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *proxy_owner); extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock); +extern void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter); extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task);
