I'm sorry for making such a stupid mistake. There was only one patch committed
before(5615f69bc209 "ARM: 9016/2: Initialize the mapping of KASan shadow
memory"), and I used the same subject by mistake.
Thanks for your correction, I will revise the subject and resend it. How about
using "arm: mm: kasan_init" in the subject?
On 2021/3/27 18:20, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> Why do you have 9016/2 in the subject line? That's an identifier from
> the patch system which shouldn't be in the subject line.
>
> If you want to refer to something already committed, please do so via
> the sha1 git hash and quote the first line of the commit description
> within ("...") in the body of your commit description.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 04:30:18PM +0800, Shixin Liu wrote:
>> Symbol 'tmp_pmd_table' is not used outside of kasan_init.c and only used
>> when CONFIG_ARM_LPAE enabled. So marks it static and add it into
>> CONFIG_ARM_LPAE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shixin Liu <liushix...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mm/kasan_init.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/arm/mm/kasan_init.c
>> index 9c348042a724..3a06d3b51f97 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/kasan_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/kasan_init.c
>> @@ -27,7 +27,9 @@
>>
>> static pgd_t tmp_pgd_table[PTRS_PER_PGD] __initdata __aligned(PGD_SIZE);
>>
>> -pmd_t tmp_pmd_table[PTRS_PER_PMD] __page_aligned_bss;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
>> +static pmd_t tmp_pmd_table[PTRS_PER_PMD] __page_aligned_bss;
>> +#endif
>>
>> static __init void *kasan_alloc_block(size_t size)
>> {
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
