On 3/26/21 4:38 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/26/21 4:35 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> writes:
>>
>>> On 3/26/21 4:23 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>> Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/26/21 2:29 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>>>> Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We go through various hoops to disallow signals for the IO threads, but
>>>>>>> there's really no reason why we cannot just allow them. The IO threads
>>>>>>> never return to userspace like a normal thread, and hence don't go 
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>> normal signal processing. Instead, just check for a pending signal as 
>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>> of the work loop, and call get_signal() to handle it for us if anything
>>>>>>> is pending.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With that, we can support receiving signals, including special ones like
>>>>>>> SIGSTOP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  fs/io-wq.c    | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>>>>  fs/io_uring.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>>>>>>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
>>>>>>> index b7c1fa932cb3..3e2f059a1737 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/fs/io-wq.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/io-wq.c
>>>>>>> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/rculist_nulls.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/tracehook.h>
>>>>>>> -#include <linux/freezer.h>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  #include "../kernel/sched/sched.h"
>>>>>>>  #include "io-wq.h"
>>>>>>> @@ -503,10 +502,16 @@ static int io_wqe_worker(void *data)
>>>>>>>                 if (io_flush_signals())
>>>>>>>                         continue;
>>>>>>>                 ret = schedule_timeout(WORKER_IDLE_TIMEOUT);
>>>>>>> -               if (try_to_freeze() || ret)
>>>>>>> +               if (signal_pending(current)) {
>>>>>>> +                       struct ksignal ksig;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +                       if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
>>>>>>> +                               break;
>>>>>>> +                       if (get_signal(&ksig))
>>>>>>> +                               continue;
>>>>>>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is wrong.  You are promising to deliver a signal to signal
>>>>>> handler and them simply discarding it.  Perhaps:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                  if (!get_signal(&ksig))
>>>>>>                          continue;
>>>>>>                  WARN_ON(!sig_kernel_stop(ksig->sig));
>>>>>>                         break;
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, updated.
>>>>
>>>> Gah.  Kill the WARN_ON.
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking "WARN_ON(!sig_kernel_fatal(ksig->sig));"
>>>> The function sig_kernel_fatal does not exist.
>>>>
>>>> Fatal is the state that is left when a signal is neither
>>>> ignored nor a stop signal, and does not have a handler.
>>>>
>>>> The rest of the logic still works.
>>>
>>> I've just come to the same conclusion myself after testing it.
>>> Of the 3 cases, most of them can do the continue, but doesn't
>>> really matter with the way the loop is structured. Anyway, looks
>>> like this now:
>>
>> This idiom in the code:
>>> +           if (signal_pending(current)) {
>>> +                   struct ksignal ksig;
>>> +
>>> +                   if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
>>> +                           break;
>>> +                   if (!get_signal(&ksig))
>>> +                           continue;
>>>  }
>>
>> Needs to be:
>>> +           if (signal_pending(current)) {
>>> +                   struct ksignal ksig;
>>> +
>>> +                   if (!get_signal(&ksig))
>>> +                           continue;
>>> +                   break;
>>>  }
>>
>> Because any signal returned from get_signal is fatal in this case.
>> It might make sense to "WARN_ON(ksig->ka.sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL)".
>> As the io workers don't handle that case.
>>
>> It won't happen because you have everything blocked.
>>
>> The extra fatal_signal_pending(current) logic is just confusing in this
>> case.
> 
> OK good point, and follows the same logic even if it won't make a
> difference in my case. I'll make the change.

Made the suggested edits and ran the quick tests and the KILL/STOP
testing, and no ill effects observed. Kicked off the longer runs now.

Not a huge amount of changes from the posted series, but please peruse
here if you want to double check:

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=io_uring-5.12

And diff against v2 posted is below. Thanks!

diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 3e2f059a1737..7434eb40ca8c 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -505,10 +505,9 @@ static int io_wqe_worker(void *data)
                if (signal_pending(current)) {
                        struct ksignal ksig;
 
-                       if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
-                               break;
-                       if (get_signal(&ksig))
+                       if (!get_signal(&ksig))
                                continue;
+                       break;
                }
                if (ret)
                        continue;
@@ -722,10 +721,9 @@ static int io_wq_manager(void *data)
                if (signal_pending(current)) {
                        struct ksignal ksig;
 
-                       if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
-                               set_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &wq->state);
-                       else if (get_signal(&ksig))
+                       if (!get_signal(&ksig))
                                continue;
+                       set_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &wq->state);
                }
        } while (!test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &wq->state));
 
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 66ae46874d85..880abd8b6d31 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -6746,10 +6746,9 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
                if (signal_pending(current)) {
                        struct ksignal ksig;
 
-                       if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
-                               break;
-                       if (get_signal(&ksig))
+                       if (!get_signal(&ksig))
                                continue;
+                       break;
                }
                sqt_spin = false;
                cap_entries = !list_is_singular(&sqd->ctx_list);
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 5b75fbe3d2d6..f2718350bf4b 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2752,15 +2752,6 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
                 */
                current->flags |= PF_SIGNALED;
 
-               /*
-                * PF_IO_WORKER threads will catch and exit on fatal signals
-                * themselves. They have cleanup that must be performed, so
-                * we cannot call do_exit() on their behalf. coredumps also
-                * do not apply to them.
-                */
-               if (current->flags & PF_IO_WORKER)
-                       return false;
-
                if (sig_kernel_coredump(signr)) {
                        if (print_fatal_signals)
                                print_fatal_signal(ksig->info.si_signo);
@@ -2776,6 +2767,14 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
                        do_coredump(&ksig->info);
                }
 
+               /*
+                * PF_IO_WORKER threads will catch and exit on fatal signals
+                * themselves. They have cleanup that must be performed, so
+                * we cannot call do_exit() on their behalf.
+                */
+               if (current->flags & PF_IO_WORKER)
+                       goto out;
+
                /*
                 * Death signals, no core dump.
                 */
@@ -2783,7 +2782,7 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
                /* NOTREACHED */
        }
        spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
-
+out:
        ksig->sig = signr;
 
        if (!(ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS))

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to