On 13/03/21 06:10, lihaiwei.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Haiwei Li <lihai...@tencent.com>

kvm_msr_ignored_check function never uses vcpu argument. Clean up the
function and invokers.

Signed-off-by: Haiwei Li <lihai...@tencent.com>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++-----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 012d5df..27e9ee8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
   * When called, it means the previous get/set msr reached an invalid msr.
   * Return true if we want to ignore/silent this failed msr access.
   */
-static bool kvm_msr_ignored_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr,
-                                 u64 data, bool write)
+static bool kvm_msr_ignored_check(u32 msr, u64 data, bool write)
  {
        const char *op = write ? "wrmsr" : "rdmsr";
@@ -1447,7 +1446,7 @@ static int do_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned index, u64 *data)
        if (r == KVM_MSR_RET_INVALID) {
                /* Unconditionally clear the output for simplicity */
                *data = 0;
-               if (kvm_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, 0, false))
+               if (kvm_msr_ignored_check(index, 0, false))
                        r = 0;
        }
@@ -1613,7 +1612,7 @@ static int kvm_set_msr_ignored_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
        int ret = __kvm_set_msr(vcpu, index, data, host_initiated);
if (ret == KVM_MSR_RET_INVALID)
-               if (kvm_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, data, true))
+               if (kvm_msr_ignored_check(index, data, true))
                        ret = 0;
return ret;
@@ -1651,7 +1650,7 @@ static int kvm_get_msr_ignored_check(struct kvm_vcpu 
*vcpu,
        if (ret == KVM_MSR_RET_INVALID) {
                /* Unconditionally clear *data for simplicity */
                *data = 0;
-               if (kvm_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, 0, false))
+               if (kvm_msr_ignored_check(index, 0, false))
                        ret = 0;
        }

Reply via email to