Some checkpatch errors are found that some white spaces are missing or
being used inappropriately. So fix them all.

Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <luojiax...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c |  2 +-
 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c 
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
index 4a39848..3692817 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int sas_get_port_device(struct asd_sas_port *port)
                struct dev_to_host_fis *fis =
                        (struct dev_to_host_fis *) dev->frame_rcvd;
                if (fis->interrupt_reason == 1 && fis->lbal == 1 &&
-                   fis->byte_count_low==0x69 && fis->byte_count_high == 0x96
+                   fis->byte_count_low == 0x69 && fis->byte_count_high == 0x96
                    && (fis->device & ~0x10) == 0)
                        dev->dev_type = SAS_SATA_PM;
                else
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c 
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index ebb55e4..fc6b9d8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static int sas_ex_manuf_info(struct domain_device *dev)
 
        mi_req[1] = SMP_REPORT_MANUF_INFO;
 
-       res = smp_execute_task(dev, mi_req, MI_REQ_SIZE, mi_resp,MI_RESP_SIZE);
+       res = smp_execute_task(dev, mi_req, MI_REQ_SIZE, mi_resp, MI_RESP_SIZE);
        if (res) {
                pr_notice("MI: ex %016llx failed:0x%x\n",
                          SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), res);
@@ -594,13 +594,13 @@ int sas_smp_phy_control(struct domain_device *dev, int 
phy_id,
 
        pc_req[1] = SMP_PHY_CONTROL;
        pc_req[9] = phy_id;
-       pc_req[10]= phy_func;
+       pc_req[10] = phy_func;
        if (rates) {
                pc_req[32] = rates->minimum_linkrate << 4;
                pc_req[33] = rates->maximum_linkrate << 4;
        }
 
-       res = smp_execute_task(dev, pc_req, PC_REQ_SIZE, pc_resp,PC_RESP_SIZE);
+       res = smp_execute_task(dev, pc_req, PC_REQ_SIZE, pc_resp, PC_RESP_SIZE);
        if (res) {
                pr_err("ex %016llx phy%02d PHY control failed: %d\n",
                       SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, res);
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
        req[9] = phy->number;
 
        res = smp_execute_task(dev, req, RPEL_REQ_SIZE,
-                                   resp, RPEL_RESP_SIZE);
+                              resp, RPEL_RESP_SIZE);
 
        if (res)
                goto out;
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ int sas_get_report_phy_sata(struct domain_device *dev, int 
phy_id,
        rps_req[9] = phy_id;
 
        res = smp_execute_task(dev, rps_req, RPS_REQ_SIZE,
-                                   rps_resp, RPS_RESP_SIZE);
+                              rps_resp, RPS_RESP_SIZE);
 
        /* 0x34 is the FIS type for the D2H fis.  There's a potential
         * standards cockup here.  sas-2 explicitly specifies the FIS
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ static int sas_ex_discover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, 
int phy_id)
                         */
                        if (SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr) ==
                            SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)) {
-                               ex->ex_phy[i].phy_state= PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED;
+                               ex->ex_phy[i].phy_state = PHY_DEVICE_DISCOVERED;
                                if (sas_ex_join_wide_port(dev, i))
                                        pr_debug("Attaching ex phy%02d to wide 
port %016llx\n",
                                                 i, 
SAS_ADDR(ex->ex_phy[i].attached_sas_addr));
@@ -1533,7 +1533,8 @@ static int sas_configure_phy(struct domain_device *dev, 
int phy_id,
        if (res)
                return res;
        if (include ^ present)
-               return sas_configure_set(dev, phy_id, sas_addr, index,include);
+               return sas_configure_set(dev, phy_id, sas_addr, index,
+                                        include);
 
        return res;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to