On Jan 17, 2008 11:16 PM, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote: > > > > Your meaning isn't clear. Do you mean that your patch doesn't generate > > > any lockdep warnings at all? Or do you mean that it generates a single > > > lockdep warning at boot time and then no more warnings afterward? > > > > I means the latter one. > > That's very bad. > > For each type of violation, lockdep only gives one error message. So > the fact that you get one message at boot time and then no more doesn't > mean the code is almost right -- it probably means the code has lots of > errors and you're seeing only the first one.
You are right, I should have check all possible one. > > Alan Stern > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/