On Thursday 17 January 2008 12:43:43 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [PATCH] x86: copy srat table and unmap in acpi_parse_table > > > > > > the old acpi_numa_slit_init was saving old address in early stage > > acpi_slit and acpi_parse_table can not unmap address that. the patch > > copy the slit in the callback, so we could unmap table in > > acpi_parse_table instead of outside track it. > > > > need to revert > > " > > commit d8d28f25f33c6a035cdfb1d421c79293d16e5c58 > > Author: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu Jan 17 15:26:42 2008 +0100 > > > > x86: ACPI: fix mapping leaks > > > > ioremap_early() is stateful, hence we cannot tolerate mapping leaks. > > " > > > > before appling this patch > > do you mean your patch should be applied first, then the > d8d28f25f33c6a03 patch should applied as second?
d8d28f25f33c6a03 is not needed > > Or if d8d28f25f33c6a03 really needs to be reverted to get your system to > boot properly, which particular bit of it was causing trouble for you? > (or the whole thing?) we need to call acpi_os_unmap_memory in acpi_table_parse or just after it. call it in acpi_table_parse is much cleaner the problem is that acpi_numa_slit_init do bad assumaption that it still can use address after it's callback function. so we need to copy the slit. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/