On Thursday 17 January 2008 12:43:43 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > [PATCH] x86: copy srat table and unmap in acpi_parse_table
> > 
> > 
> > the old acpi_numa_slit_init was saving old address in early stage 
> > acpi_slit and acpi_parse_table can not unmap address that. the patch 
> > copy the slit in the callback, so we could unmap table in 
> > acpi_parse_table instead of outside track it.
> > 
> > need to revert
> > "
> > commit d8d28f25f33c6a035cdfb1d421c79293d16e5c58
> > Author: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date:   Thu Jan 17 15:26:42 2008 +0100
> > 
> >     x86: ACPI: fix mapping leaks
> > 
> >     ioremap_early() is stateful, hence we cannot tolerate mapping leaks.
> > "
> > 
> > before appling this patch
> 
> do you mean your patch should be applied first, then the 
> d8d28f25f33c6a03 patch should applied as second?
d8d28f25f33c6a03  is not needed

> 
> Or if d8d28f25f33c6a03 really needs to be reverted to get your system to 
> boot properly, which particular bit of it was causing trouble for you? 
> (or the whole thing?)

we need to call acpi_os_unmap_memory in acpi_table_parse or just after it.

call it in acpi_table_parse is much cleaner

the problem is that acpi_numa_slit_init do bad assumaption that it still can 
use address after it's callback function.
so we need to copy the slit.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to