In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> I know this code has undefined behaviour at _runtime_. But I thought
> you were obliged to allow it to compile. That was my only point.

There is no distinction between compilation and runtime in the standard.
Actually, C could be interpreted, or a very smart compiler could also
think real hard and replace the whole program by an equivalent printf().

Besides, a standard (C99) compiler will reject the 'main' definition.
At least, the return type cannot be implicit anymore.


        --Thomas Pornin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to