From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
gcc-11 starts warning about misleading indentation inside of macros:
drivers/misc/kgdbts.c: In function ‘kgdbts_break_test’:
drivers/misc/kgdbts.c:103:9: error: this ‘if’ clause does not guard...
[-Werror=misleading-indentation]
103 | if (verbose > 1) \
| ^~
drivers/misc/kgdbts.c:200:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘v2printk’
200 | v2printk("kgdbts: breakpoint complete\n");
| ^~~~~~~~
drivers/misc/kgdbts.c:105:17: note: ...this statement, but the latter is
misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘if’
105 | touch_nmi_watchdog(); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The code looks correct to me, so just reindent it for readability.
Fixes: e8d31c204e36 ("kgdb: add kgdb internal test suite")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
drivers/misc/kgdbts.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c b/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
index 945701bce553..2e081a58da6c 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
@@ -95,19 +95,19 @@
#include <asm/sections.h>
-#define v1printk(a...) do { \
- if (verbose) \
- printk(KERN_INFO a); \
- } while (0)
-#define v2printk(a...) do { \
- if (verbose > 1) \
- printk(KERN_INFO a); \
- touch_nmi_watchdog(); \
- } while (0)
-#define eprintk(a...) do { \
- printk(KERN_ERR a); \
- WARN_ON(1); \
- } while (0)
+#define v1printk(a...) do { \
+ if (verbose) \
+ printk(KERN_INFO a); \
+} while (0)
+#define v2printk(a...) do { \
+ if (verbose > 1) \
+ printk(KERN_INFO a); \
+ touch_nmi_watchdog(); \
+} while (0)
+#define eprintk(a...) do { \
+ printk(KERN_ERR a); \
+ WARN_ON(1); \
+} while (0)
#define MAX_CONFIG_LEN 40
static struct kgdb_io kgdbts_io_ops;
--
2.29.2
