On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 14:26, Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:41:06 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > We recently converted arm64 to use arch_stack_walk() in commit:
> >
> > 5fc57df2f6fd ("arm64: stacktrace: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK")
> >
> > The core stacktrace code expects that (when tracing the current task)
> > arch_stack_walk() starts a trace at its caller, and does not include
> > itself in the trace. However, arm64's arch_stack_walk() includes itself,
> > and so traces include one more entry than callers expect. The core
> > stacktrace code which calls arch_stack_walk() tries to skip a number of
> > entries to prevent itself appearing in a trace, and the additional entry
> > prevents skipping one of the core stacktrace functions, leaving this in
> > the trace unexpectedly.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
>
> [1/1] arm64: stacktrace: don't trace arch_stack_walk()
> https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/c607ab4f916d
>
Ehm, did anyone check if the following caveat regarding
__builtin_frame_address() applies on arm64? (from the GCC man page
[0])
"""
Calling this function with a nonzero argument can have unpredictable
effects, including crashing the calling program. As a result, calls
that are considered unsafe are diagnosed when the -Wframe-address
option is in effect. Such calls should only be made in debugging
situations.
"""
[0] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Return-Address.html
