On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote: > > > The lockdep warining was posted in the below thread, actually, I have > > built and run this patced kernel for several days, there's no more > > warnings. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/3/2 > > Your meaning isn't clear. Do you mean that your patch doesn't generate > any lockdep warnings at all? Or do you mean that it generates a single > lockdep warning at boot time and then no more warnings afterward?
So it wasn't only my sleeping problem! This: "One lockdep warning detected as following, thus use mutex_lock_nested with SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING in class_device_add" seems to say that mutex_lock_nested is used in the patch just to remove this one possible warning... Regards, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
