On Jan 16, 2008 6:56 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you really want an seqlock free algorithm (I _do_ want this for
> tracing!) :) maybe going in the RCU direction could help (I refer to my
> RCU-based 32-to-64 bits lockless timestamp counter extension, which
> could be turned into the clocksource updater).

Yea. After our earlier discussion and talking w/ Steven, I'm taking a
swing at this now.  The lock-free method still doesn't apply to the
update_wall_time function, but does work fine for the monotonic cycle
uses.  I'll send a patch for review as soon as I get things building.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to