From: Yue Hu <huy...@yulong.com>

There are several redundant calls to ufshcd_is_wb_allowed() as below:

ufshcd_wb_config()
  |-> ufshcd_is_wb_allowed()
  |-> ufshcd_wb_toggle() -> ufshcd_is_wb_allowed()
  |-> ufshcd_wb_toggle_flush() -> ufshcd_is_wb_allowed()

wb_on_store()
  |-> ufshcd_is_wb_allowed()
  |-> ufshcd_wb_toggle() -> ufshcd_is_wb_allowed()

Considering code handling in wb_on_store(), let's remove needless
ufshcd_is_wb_allowed() in ufshcd_wb_toggle(). Meanwhile, keep the
check in caller ufshcd_devfreq_scale(). Accordingly, also remove
the redundant check in ufshcd_wb_toggle_flush().

Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huy...@yulong.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index b6bfc80..ee71cba 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1260,7 +1260,8 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool 
scale_up)
        /* Enable Write Booster if we have scaled up else disable it */
        downgrade_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
        is_writelock = false;
-       ufshcd_wb_toggle(hba, scale_up);
+       if (ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba))
+               ufshcd_wb_toggle(hba, scale_up);
 
 out_unprepare:
        ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(hba, is_writelock);
@@ -5438,9 +5439,6 @@ int ufshcd_wb_toggle(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool enable)
 {
        int ret;
 
-       if (!ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba))
-               return 0;
-
        if (!(enable ^ hba->dev_info.wb_enabled))
                return 0;
 
@@ -5477,8 +5475,7 @@ static inline void ufshcd_wb_toggle_flush(struct ufs_hba 
*hba, bool enable)
 {
        int ret;
 
-       if (!ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba) ||
-           hba->dev_info.wb_buf_flush_enabled == enable)
+       if (hba->dev_info.wb_buf_flush_enabled == enable)
                return;
 
        ret = __ufshcd_wb_toggle(hba, enable, QUERY_FLAG_IDN_WB_BUFF_FLUSH_EN);
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to