On March 16, 2021 12:25, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:08:08PM +0000, Zhou Ti (x2019cwm) wrote: >> But I don't think it's a good idea to handle this in callers, because >> logically the function shouldn't return negative values. Returning 0 >> directly would allow idle governors to get another chance to select >> again.
>A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >A: Top-posting. >Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Sorry about it, I am a newbie, I won't do it again.
