On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:52:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > My understanding is mostly, but with some objections. And I kinda > don't want to let this die in a bikeshed and then not getting rid of > follow_pfn as a result. There's enough people who acked this, and the > full removal got some nack from Mauro iirc.
Hmm, ok I must have missed that. I defintively prefer your series over doing nothing, but killing the dead horse ASAP would be even better.
