On 11.03.2021 11:50, Ansuel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:32:21AM -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:12:48AM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:
Document nvmem-cells compatible used to treat mtd partitions as a
nvmem provider.
Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuels...@gmail.com>
---
.../bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b53faf87d4e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Nvmem cells
+
+description: |
+ Any partition containing the compatible "nvmem-cells" will register as a
+ nvmem provider.
+ Each direct subnodes represents a nvmem cell following the nvmem binding.
+ Nvmem binding to declare nvmem-cells can be found in:
+ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
+
+maintainers:
+ - Ansuel Smith <ansuels...@gmail.com>
+
+allOf:
+ - $ref: "../../nvmem/nvmem.yaml#"
I'd rather have the 'absolute' path:
/schemas/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
Should I send a v7?
Yes, please, let's make it the right way :)
When sending V7 please:
1. Include above "Reviewed-by" in the "dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-cells
compatible"
2. Include my "Tested-by" in the "mtd: core: add nvmem-cells compatible to parse mtd
as nvmem cells"
Reference:
[PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: core: add nvmem-partitions compatible to parse mtd as nvmem
cells
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/patch/20210216212638.28382-3-ansuels...@gmail.com/
