On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:28:02PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 06:14:37PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 09 Mar 2021, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:06:05AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> > > > > From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> > > > >
> > > > > The handle_exit_race() function is defined in commit 9c3f39860367
> > > > > ("futex: Cure exit race"), which never returns -EBUSY. This results
> > > > > in a small piece of dead code in the attach_to_pi_owner() function:
> > > > >
> > > > > int ret = handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, p); /* Never return
> > > > > -EBUSY */
> > > > > ...
> > > > > if (ret == -EBUSY)
> > > > > *exiting = p; /* dead code */
> > > > >
> > > > > The return value -EBUSY is added to handle_exit_race() in upsteam
> > > > > commit ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when
> > > > > owner is exiting"). This commit was incorporated into v4.9.255, before
> > > > > the function handle_exit_race() was introduced, whitout Modify
> > > > > handle_exit_race().
> > > > >
> > > > > To fix dead code, extract the change of handle_exit_race() from
> > > > > commit ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when
> > > > > owner
> > > > > is exiting"), re-incorporated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lee writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > This commit takes the remaining functional snippet of:
> > > > >
> > > > > ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when owner is
> > > > > exiting")
> > > > >
> > > > > ... and is the correct fix for this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 9c3f39860367 ("futex: Cure exit race")
> > > > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.9.258
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaom...@huawei.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyeji...@huawei.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > kernel/futex.c | 6 +++---
> > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > Same here, what is the upstream git id?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have one as such - it's a part-patch:
> > >
> > > > > This commit takes the remaining functional snippet of:
> > > > >
> > > > > ac31c7ff8624409 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when owner is
> > > > > exiting")
> >
> > That wasn't obvious :(
>
> This was also my thinking, which is why I replied to the original
> patch in an attempt to clarify what I thought was happening.
>
> > Is this a backport of another patch in the stable tree somewhere?
>
> Yes, it looks like it.
>
> The full patch was back-ported to v4.14 as:
>
> e6e00df182908f34360c3c9f2d13cc719362e9c0
Ok, Zheng, can you put this information in the patch and resend the
whole series?
thanks,
greg k-h
