On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:39:47 +0100 Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12-01-08 12:12, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > I'm a bit confused here. Bjorn Helgaas wanted to remove the > > pnp_start/stop_dev() calls completely, and you want them called all the > > time. :) > > Wanted where? Haven't seen a coment from Bjorn? But -- while removing them > both looks (as) sensible from a mirror-image viewpoint, this wouldn't fix > the problem. > Ah, sorry. It was a different thread. Look for a mail with the subject "PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path" in the LKML och linux-pm archives. > > But we certainly need the pnp_start_dev() in the current flow of things. It > not being called is the problem this fixes... > I think the previous suggestion was that the drivers should call this, not the core, so that it behaved more like other parts of the kernel (e.g. PCI). Rgds Pierre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
